Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Diversity

When I was ministering in Salem, I learned a valuable lesson about true diversity. Our inter-faith religious leaders group had the challenge of being truly inter-faith. It wasn't the typical group of Christian clergy making room for the rabbi. The faith communities in Salem included Fundamentalist house churches, B'haiis, and pagans of many stripes. When we gathered in community worship we found that we couldn't just reduce everything down to that which wouldn't offend. It was alright when the Christians met with Jews, we could agree to stick with the Old Testament, but start throwing in groups that don't recognize that as scripture and you start to find less to share. This least common denominator approach proved quickly to be ineffective, since it left us with nothing to use. Instead we decided to welcome each participant to bring something from the richness of his or her tradition. This developed into a new tradition for us. At the end of each joint worship service, every participating religious leader offered a benediction. The rainbow blessing of multiple faiths was rich and deep.

I have brought that mentality into my pastoral ministry among you. I realized early on that there wasn't and wouldn't be unanimity of beliefs here. One option might have been to try to change those who differed with me, possibly even working to eradicate the opposition. While I certainly am tempted at times to move in that direction, I always quickly snuff out this sinful tendency. Neither can it become a numbers game. In this respect, absolute democracy cannot be our model. It is too easy to marginalize and even oppress any minority, but particularly small ones. Our community needs the richness and depth provided by every member and thus must be respectful of every opinion. This is by no means easy to do. We must agree to disagree, without becoming disagreeable. That requires of us two critical behaviors. First, you must be willing to speak up when you are in the minority, even if that becomes a minority of one! Second, you must be willing to listen to the opinions of those who disagree with you. If we can keep our speaking and listening in balance and full of respect, we will know the richness of diversity.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Just Say "No" to War


The Collegium of Officers of the United Church of Christ have written a powerful pastoral letter against the war in Iraq and are asking others to sign the letter. Their goal is 100,000 signatures by World Communion Sunday, October 7. They call us to seek forgiveness for "the arrogant unilateralism of preemptive war." They also call us to "cast off the fear that has made us accept the way of violence and return to the way of Jesus."

The ideal of returning to the way of Jesus coupled with the letter's opening paragraph decrying the way this war was justified serve as a reminder that the acceptance of war as a necessary evil was not always a part of Christian thinking. For the first three centuries of Christianity, pacifism was the primary view of Christians. Early church leaders such as Origen and Tertullian wrote tracts on the subject. Roman soldiers who converted to Christianity were instructed not to kill! All of that changed rapidly when the emperor Constantine made Christianity the official state religion. By his edict, Christians went from being social pariahs who could be killed for their beliefs to being the only ones who could be soldiers or political leaders. Needless to say, this had a radical impact on Christian teaching. Augustine created a compromise position, which has come to be knows as the Just War Theory, stipulating principles that had to be met in order for a war to be considered just. Just War Theory is clear that no war can be started preemptively as an act of aggression, that it cannot be used for acquisition of land, power or resources, and that civilians may never be targeted. Applied to the current war, all of these principles raise serious questions. In fact, the sickening ratio of civilian to military causalities in every battle fought today begs the question of whether modern warfare can ever be considered just.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Still Speaking To...


One of the oddities of our polity in the United Church of Christ is that our leaders are not empowered to speak for us, instead they may speak to us. Our church government is not a republic or a representative democracy. We elect our leaders to serve us, not represent us. This is also true when delegates gather at the various settings of our church: Association, Conference and General Synod. Some have argued that since these bodies cannot speak for us that they should not make statements of witness. A primary reason why we haven't gone that route is that we perceive a need to listen for the still-speaking God's prophetic call to the churches. So, when General Synod gathered in Hartford this past week, a number of resolutions called the churches out to social action and witness in the world. Some of us won't agree to do what we are asked to do by this body of delegates. That should come as no surprise since to the best of my knowledge all of the votes included votes in opposition, thus not even all of those speaking to us agree with each other.


And that is another odd strength of our denomination; our attempt to seek unity without simultaneously embracing diversity. There is a great story by an Episcopal priest named Martin Bell called Rag-Tag Army. In it, Bell describes an army on the march, led by God. This army contains some who are barefoot, some off wandering in the brambles and some playing with frogs. The drumbeat isn't regular and no one is in step. But God keeps stopping to make sure that no one gets lost. Some in this army hold hands but that leaves those on the end of the line without a hand to hold, so they join hands and make a circle. A large circle is deceptive because it appears that the marchers are going somewhere other than round and round. Still, God won't stop. The march goes on.


I love that story for the image of the variety of us Christians stumbling along, no matter who we are or where we are on life's journey. God refuses to move the march along if even one would be left behind. For that truth we can shout “ALL-eluia!”


I also have long loved that story for the simple truth it tells about human nature. We are indeed God's rag-tag little army, doing our best to stay on task following God. So sometimes we have to resist the temptation to take charge, but only speak to one another what we think we have heard are the orders of the one leading the march. Even when we hear more of ourselves or our fellow marchers and not enough of the true leader, we can still at least rejoice that God is still speaking...and still leading!

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Last Day of General Synod



Today was a day busy with business at Synod. Much of today's time was spent taking action on resolutions. The first two resolutions addressed both concerned the resolution passed at General Synod two years ago in Atlanta supporting equal marriage rights for all. According to the standing rules for this gathering, resolutions of witness such as these require a 2/3 majority vote. So, even though it might appear that the Synod was weak-willed on these resolutions by voting “no action,” there are two important points to make. First of all, the votes were overwhelming (as they needed to be) and the reason given by the committee for taking “no action” in lieu of simply voting to defeat the resolutions was that this was one way of recognizing the divisive nature of this issue within our denomination. I must agree that since the committee (representing 10% of the delegates) reported that the opinion of the committee members was nearly unanimous in opposition, it would do little good to bring about a vote that might re-open wounds and end in no change of position. This is a good model of the church at work.


Another moving moment occurred when actress Lynn Redgrave shared the story of her struggle with breast cancer, accompanied by a powerful collection of photos taken by her daughter. At the heart of her tale was the fact that she had not been a regular church-goer, but after her mastectomy she heard that there was a female minister at a church in her town, so she went because she thought a woman might be more understanding. On her first Sunday there she heard words that were familiar and prayers for others who were likewise suffering and it put her suffering in perspective, and as she put it, she “lost her innocence.” It was stirring and assuring to hear someone speaking of finding care and comfort in the local church. This is where “the rubber hits the road” in church growth.


In the afternoon, a pastor of a church who three weeks ago took a vote considering leaving the UCC spoke to the body telling us that he encouraged his church to remain in the denomination because as he put it, “they need us for theological diversity.” He told us that a later speaker said, “sure, they need us but they don't want us.” He then assured us that his experience at General Synod has been one of extravagant welcome and thus supported the resolution on Reaffirming Our Commitment to Observing Covenant (or something like that...it was renamed from Reaffirming Our Faith to Retain Our Churches). It was nearly unanimously passed, certainly reaffirming our commitment to seek unity in diversity.


A resolution stating concern about the nation's immigration policies was passed after a small amount of debate. A resolution calling for a study of the issue of the legalization of physician aid in dying was passed on a split vote (2/3 was required) after some amendments and much debate. A resolution calling for solidarity with the persecuted in the Philippines, where disappearances and death squads are serious problems, was passed after a minor debate about language. The final resolution was in opposition to the use of depleted uranium in weapons and passed easily.


Typical of church business, a large amount of time was devoted to an issue involving a simple issue of the allocation of money. On a close vote, the body decided to allocate money from the Strengthen the Church offering to support the Still Speaking Initiative. The beauty of the process was shown in the fact that after the vote count was announced, the moderator's request that there be no applause was honored and a prayer was offered instead.


While there is a tad bit of business left that will push the beginning of evening worship back some, all that remains is closing worship in which we will be challenged and anointed to service.


Monday, June 25, 2007

Monday at General Synod

This afternoon in the plenary session of the General Synod, a resolution calling on us as churches of the UCC to address global warming was nearly unanimously passed. An interesting (at least to this vegetarian) was an effort to insert a call to encourage a movement toward a plant-based diet since, according to the one making the suggestion, animal agricultural efforts contribute 18% of greenhouse gases world-wide. The amendment was out of order for parliamentary reasons, so the will of the body was never determined.


During her candidate's speech , Edith Guffey (Associate General Minister) mentioned something that struck a chord with me. She pointed out that most members of the UCC don't know who the denominational officers are. This came home to me yesterday when one church member asked about who the people were that we pray for during our communion prayers and another, who attended the worship at Synod yesterday, said, “So THAT is John Thomas.” So whether you've met them or not, our leaders are busy serving the church and I can assure you that they appreciate our prayers.


Marian Wright Edelman, director of the Children's Defense Fund, continued the practice of delivering exceptionally inspirational keynote addresses at General Synod. She delivered an impassioned plea to work to make sure that Congress provide health care coverage for 9 million uninsured children in America. She pointed out that Congress voted to go to war in Iraq without first coming up with the money to so, and isn't providing health care to children more important? She ended with a prayer that included “Dear God, let us not confuse what is perfectly legal with what is right and just in your eyes. Amen.”


Ken Medema, an extremely talented musician, was charged with responding in song. He improvised a beautiful song incorporating words from the person who introduced her, “sometimes you have to stand up when you just want to sit down.” So he sang to Marian that we would all stand up and not sit down until the job is done. While he was singing, one by one people in the audience stood up. By the end of the song we were all standing, many wiping tears away. Marian was among the tearful as she ran back onto the stage to embrace Ken in thanks.


Filled with the inspiration of that moment I left the building to join in a march around the block in protest of the war. As I turned one corner I encountered our Associate Conference Minister, Peter Wells, standing on a wall staring down the marchers. He shouted “what do you want for your children?” Indeed, we all want peace.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

General Synod

Busy days are in order because the United Church of Christ is celebrating its 50th birthday at its annual meeting in Hartford and I've been attending. Today was day 2 of 5.

Today's buzz was all about Senator Obama. Unfortunately, like Barack's own pastor, I had to miss his speech since I was elsewhere officiating a wedding. It was very lovely and through the wonders of the Internet I don't have to miss the speech...and neither do you. You can view it here or you can read the text here

The part of the day that I did attend that was incredibly inspiring was the address by Bill Moyers. In addition to his credentials as a first-rate journalist with impeccable integrity, he also has earned a Masters of Divinity and that showed in his talk this morning. He reminded us that Jesus saw the corruption in the temple and "threw the rascals out." He called on us to do the same with the corrupt leaders in our goverment for the sake of preserving democracy. You can read more about his talk by following the link in the UCC headlines section that has been newly added to our church web site at www.brimfieldfcc.org.

I also attended a stimulating talk about on-line social networking and the implications for the way our youth are learning to socialize. It is a little hard to unpack that in this email, but I am very interested in this topic and will try to involve our youth more in this area. One interesting development is that there is now a UCC church under construction in Second Life. If that means nothing to you, don't fret, but if you already know about Second Life, check out the island of Xenia and look for Sophianne Rhode.

Tonight the birthday party for the denomination included a tribute to the inventor of the laser, who is a member of a UCC congregation. He spoke to us about the compatibility and similarity of religion and science. We also got to see a flashy demonstration of his invention. Here is some video:


I need to do a lot of digesting and review my notes to be able to post some responses. Tomorrow is a time for a huge worship service, I can't wait!

Friday, May 25, 2007

There Is No They


At the World Series of Birding, there is a longstanding tradition of “breaking bread with the enemy.” This takes the formal form of a “swap meet” on the Thursday night before the competition. The informal breaking of bread with the enemy is a continual process that begins as soon as two birders who are scouting for their respective teams meet in the field. It also takes the form of shared trips into the field, and this year it even included a web site updated daily by one of the top-flight teams. Our team, the Wicked Witchities, was able to add a number of nests and one particularly active feeder because we were in regular contact with other teams’ scouts. In fact, on most days of the week preceding the competition, at least one of my teammates was scouting with one or more scouts from another team. One day I met up with another team’s scout in the field who had been speaking to one of my teammates more recently than I had! All of this is the case because we all believe that a rising tide raises all boats. In other words, one way to help one team do well is by helping all the teams do better. Even though this is a competitive event, there is more emphasis on the birds than the birders. Of course I want my team to do better than other teams, but while we are witchities and they are luna-ticks or lagerheads, we are all lovers of birds and trying to help preserve them and the environment that sustains them.

Unfortunately, this sort of mutual aid and cooperation is all too rare in our dog-eat-dog world today. Even more sad is the way in which the divisive and demeaning practices rampant in our culture work their way into the practices of our churches. I’m particularly sorry that our local congregations remain islands of independent effort. There is a wealth of talent eager to be used in God’s service residing in the pews of all the church buildings around us as well as our own. We have all found ourselves from time to time bemoaning the fact that we don’t have enough people or other resource to accomplish some worthy goal. Perhaps if we paused every time we spoke like this and simply imagined the same conversation happening in another congregation we would begin to understand the truth that “there is no they….just more of us!” Some of us here and some more of us there could get together and get more done. I really don’t understand why there isn’t more desire for this sort of solution. Perhaps part of it lies in diminished expectations based on history. The expected way of connecting with other churches would first be through our denomination. Particularly in the United Church of Christ, we only have connection if we make it happen since there is no hierarchy to impose it. Since there seems to be a natural tendency to grant authority to those willing to represent us at wider settings, we have at times gotten ourselves into the spot of looking to “them” (i.e. the staff in Framingham or in Cleveland) to do things for “us.” But (and don’t tell me you didn’t see this coming) there is no they! There is no “they” who will come and fix our problems, there is no “they” who are the cause of our problems, there is no “they” who are the ones we need to oppose…or support. The truth about the church is that we are the body of Christ and therefore we are one. We are the ones who are both solution and source of all our problems, we are the one body, which includes diverse and opposing views and positions. With Christ as our head we don’t lack for direction. With the Holy Spirit as the breath filling the lungs of this body with life, we lack for nothing. We are strong enough to change the world, but only as we recognize our unity. If a bunch of crazed birders can find a way to work together for the common good in the course of a heated competition, then perhaps there is hope for the church of God gathering together in both large and small ways to bring the life-giving gospel to the places of hurt in the world.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Tired of Not Doin' Nothin'

One of the happiest sentences I heard uttered by a parishioner recently was “I’m tired of not doin’ nothin’.” She was suggesting a idea to do some recycling—simple enough, but significant because it mattered that it meant making a difference. Isn’t that really what we are called on to do; make a difference? During Lent we spent time reflecting on our call to be difference-makers. We dedicated fasts that included

  • walking instead of driving for short trips
  • drying laundry on the line instead of in the dryer
  • washing clothes in cold water
  • purchasing carbon offsets
  • giving up butter, drinking skim milk
  • replacing light bulbs with fluorescents
  • using the microwave less
  • give up bottled water
  • collecting empty juice and water bottles for recycling
  • spend more time as a steward of woodlands
  • give up processed foods & goods from China
  • give up the gas stove and electric lights

I can’t report on whether everyone was faithful in their fasts, but I do know some things. I know that Judy cleaned out multiple huge bags of plastic recyclables from the teachers’ lounges where she works. I know that Pat and Kate didn’t use their stove or lights for the full six weeks. And I know that my family didn’t buy the more than half-dozen cases of bottled water that we would have.

If I had to guess, I’d say that the impact we had collectively on reducing greenhouse gases was well over a hundred pounds (not to mention the two tons of offsets that were purchased). And to top it off, we planted a tree on Earth Day! We can celebrate the fact that we are indeed difference-makers. We are hearing and responding to the challenge of Dr. Suess’ Lorax, “unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better, it’s not.”

Personally, I’m still walking to the church when I can and with the warm weather a clothesline has gone up in the back yard. The great lesson from disciplines like Lenten fasts is that they can bring joy and become easier to maintain. As we all strive to make a difference with the lives we are given, we will find the power of what one person can do. As the African proverb says, "If you think you're too small to make a difference, try going to bed with a mosquito in the room.” And a people of God gathered in a community of faith practice, we also can see the power of working as one. Brothers and sisters, it is in seeing the power of difference-making that we can see the truth of our salvation!

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Ruined by Love

There is a song by U2 that includes a litany of things that the singer regrets doing, but they were all before “love came to town.” There is no doubt that when love comes to town things change radically. We see that in our lives and the lives of those around us when a couple falls in love. It is like everything is seen through a new pair of glasses.

A wise caution I have received from my Tai Chi instructor is that Tai Chi will first be a struggle, then you will love it, and then it will ruin your life! The reason that love of the practice will ruin your life is that eventually you won’t be able to find enough time to do it, not because you are avoiding doing it like at the beginning, but because you won’t want to stop doing it to do the other things in your life.

This is how love both triumphs and conquers. Love never fails. Love cannot be killed. Love is a light that is never extinguished. Love makes all things new. In love there is a new creation.

Love is the Easter story in a single word. God’s love is seen most evident in the historical moment of the first Easter morning and is felt most closely when we allow the love of Resurrection to “ruin” our lives. When the truth of God’s love for you seen in the triumph of life over death on Easter morning (not just then, but now) really grabs hold of you, nothing can ever be the same again.

The disciplines of Lent have their payoff in this moment of truth. What good has been produced in your life by walking the journey through the shadows to the light of Easter? How has that changed you so that your life is now “ruined” because you cannot not continue on the path that brought you here?

Love has come to town and now all the good that God chooses to do through you is possible…as long as you continue to be willing to walk in the light no matter how much that “ruins” the life you had before. May you know the refreshing presence of Christ who has arisen, for as you live your life for God you prove that Christ has risen indeed!

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

More Powerful as One

Simply put, if we are going to save the planet, the emphasis needs to be on the “we.” I’m not suggesting that the work each of us does individually doesn’t matter (though the impact is obviously seen collectively). But I am saying that we individual humans function a whole lot better when we act as one. Finding that unity may sound like one of the more difficult challenges that lays ahead, but I want to tell you that my experience Monday taught me otherwise.

For 16 miles from Ware to Spencer, I joined with the wonderful, faith-filled, strong-legged and beautiful-footed people who have chosen to take the Interfaith Walk for Climate Rescue. Close to 40 people shared that day’s pilgrimage and more than a dozen of them started in Northampton with the goal of going all the way to Boston. Bound together in a common purpose, we individual seekers sought out each other to learn from our diversity and exult in our unity.

There was Margaret, a likely candidate for companionship since we are both ordained. When I learned that she was Episcopalian I showed her the Anglican prayer beads that have been in my pocket every day during Lent. She responded by whipping out her own and was eager to learn how I have been using them to pray the prayer of Saint Francis. “What comes after ‘where there is darkness, light’?” she asked a number of steps closer to Spencer. “Where there is sadness, joy,” I said. Two Protestant clergy praying a Catholic prayer seems to be one simple way to becoming instruments of God’s peace.

There was Steve, culturally Jewish, but an atheist—or so said Newall as they introduced themselves to me the night before as they welcomed me into “the men’s caucus.” But gender wasn’t all that I had in common with Steve. Aside from a shared love of a laugh and my own proclivity to channel my “inner rabbi,” Steve said that he is in awe of the way that us religious folks find the motivation to do these acts of hopeful witness. Well hello Steve, you have obviously found some well to tap as well since you are taking your tired legs and aching feet all the way to Boston this week! When we get right down to it, we all have more in common than the interesting, but few things that separate us.


There was Kate, who blessed me with the most darling welcome with a hand on my cheek and a smile in her deep eyes assuring me that I would be sheltered and fed and embraced by the group. Of course she was correct. This was the sort of crowd where I knew that my vegetarian ways would be no obstacle and I indeed was fed—delicious food and nourishment that my soul devoured.


There was Wren, a species unique in all the universe. I knew better than to insult her by asking if she was four. The wisdom of my reservation was revealed when she announced to me that she was four-and-three-quarters (oh how I adore children of this age, even when they declare themselves to be "super-bear" and address me as "dinner")! During the very first steps of the day I let her know that I would be searching for other wrens today as I wanted to record all the birds we encountered on our walk. I even played the song of the Carolina Wren for her, explaining that it sounds like it is saying “teakettle, teakettle, teakettle.” 29 species and over 35,000 steps later, she was the only wren I had seen or heard. Just before dinner I probably should have changed the list total to 30 when I heard her say, “I’m a Carolina Wren…teakettle, teakettle, teakettle.” Did I mention how much I adore children who are four-and-three-quarters, especially those who at such a tender age are compelled into walking (or riding in a stroller as was more often the case) across an entire state by parents who love them enough to work to improve what is left to them?

And there were many more encounters, all equally inspirational and heartwarming during that next to last winter’s day. Each of them worked their seductive spell on me, convincing me that there is yet hope for this sorry world. Each new encounter drew me in and made my departure that much more bittersweet. If only virtually or spiritually I will return to this rag-tag band of believers. But I have a feeling that my blistered feet will pound the pavement next to theirs before the week is over because God’s grip is awfully tight at times…especially in times like these when justice is so greatly required.

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Armed and Dangerous

Many people are surprised to learn that Tai Chi is a martial art form. The gentle, wave-like motion of the gestures doesn’t appear aggressive. Indeed, they are not aggressive in the manner to which we are accustomed. We typically think of fighters as trying to find an opening to attack. Tai Chi is more of a defensive style. A Tai Chi master would be unlikely the one to begin a fight. Tai Chi is about protection of one’s space, maintaining balance throughout every gesture, and utilizing the power that comes from having all the parts of your body working together in a concerted effort to focus the force of the movement.

Unfortunately, many people today are unsurprised to hear Christianity described in terms of warfare. Much of the most vocal and celebrated portion of American Christendom focuses on alleged attacks from the secular world. There is an aggressiveness about much of this that I find troubling. I don’t think that we are called to be milquetoast Christians, we have a responsibility to spread the gospel, and it is a troubling message at times. The good news of the Bible is good only insofar as you find yourself in need of salvation. We all are sinners and thus require salvation, but the accompanying message of repentance requires behavioral change. The gospel message accomplishes H. L. Mencken’s maxim for journalists: it comforts the afflicted and afflicts the comfortable. So in the culture wars, I hope that we are messengers with an offensive message, not offensive messengers.

Do people see you as armed and dangerous? Are you grounded in the traditions and teachings of the faith? Can you deliver words of challenge and words of hope that come from the scripture? It is not necessary to memorize verses to deliver the good/offensive word. It is, however, necessary to know the word of God internally. If you arm yourself with the spiritual practices of prayer, scripture reading and worship you will be prepared to be dangerous for God when the opportunity comes to share the gospel.

In fact, if you truly internalize your spiritual discipline it will become something akin to a martial art. You will be in control of the power it gives you. You will realize that the power is actually external to you and flows through you. We speak of the Holy Spirit in a similar way that martial art masters speak of chi, the life force. If you have studied a martial art perhaps you have already made this connection. The greatest martial artists are those who control themselves, not needing to prove anything by fighting. If only we could similarly master the spiritual power available to us. Perhaps then we could work with all members of the human family to change the world for the better instead of choosing sides and battling in a culture war.

Friday, February 16, 2007

What Fast Will You Choose?



Recently, I preached a series of sermons on chapters 58 through 62 of Isaiah featuring the metaphors about light. It is a powerful read if you think about America today receiving the prophet's warning.


With Lent starting next week I'm reminded of the words we heard in chapter 58:

Is not this the fast that I choose: to loose the bonds of injustice, to undo the thongs of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free, and to break every yoke? Is it not to share your bread with the hungry, and bring the homeless poor into your house; when you see the naked, to cover them, and not to hide yourself from your own kin?

And if we heed the message, then what?

Then your light shall break forth like the dawn, and your healing shall spring up quickly; your vindicator shall go before you, the glory of the Lord shall be your rear guard.

There is good news in "right worship" (the literal meaning of orthodox). I believe there is also hope in individual action. The promise of "your light" breaking forth is not plural in the Hebrew, the promise is that your personal light will shine. Jesus would remind us not to put it under a bushel!

I'm moved by the wisdom of the ONE Campaign. Check it out here (The ONE Campaign will also be a focus of the U2charist in Longmeadow tomorrow). They are putting forth a belief in the power of ONE. Here is a part of the pledge they encourage each of us to take:

We believe we can beat AIDS, starvation and extreme poverty.

We recognize ONE billion people live on less than ONE dollar a day.

We commit ourselves - one person, one voice, one vote at a time - to a make better, safer world for all.

The power of ONE is the power of ONE person who believes that all the people of the world are ONE and that together as ONE we can build a better tomorrow. In this philosophy I hear the wisdom of the theology I proclaim that we are all ONE body with many parts, living our lives to the glory of the ONE God.
On Ash Wednesday we will hold three worship services during which you will be able to dedicate your Lenten fast. This is a chance to celebrate the power of ONE person to make a difference. With the Lorax in mind (see previous post) we are encouraging fasts that make a positive ecological impact. You can use this form to dedicate your fast. If you want to do it "virtually" you can name it in a comment to this post (anonymously if you like).

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Loraxian Theology


When I studied theology in seminary I was impressed by the variety of “liberation theologies.” Liberation theology started as a movement in Central America among impoverished and oppressed people. They read the Bible for themselves (due to a shortage of priests to interpret it for them) and saw, particularly in the Exodus story, what they came to call God’s preferential option for the poor. Like the American slaves of a century before them, they found hope in relating to the plight of God’s people who were regularly suffering under oppression and in exile. Even the New Testament church was a group that knew suffering, so indeed it is a logical point of view from which to view our faith story.

Other groups followed this theological path, most prominently African-Americans and feminists. As I was ministering among impoverished Americans, this theology fit well. Granted, I was not a part of the group myself, but I could relate to the words of Isaiah, read by Jesus, that the Spirit of God was upon me to proclaim good news to the poor. I found other theological bolstering in a movement called the Social Gospel. This early 20th century movement was the work of influential “empowered” religious leaders on behalf of working class and poor people. So all of this influences my thinking, and as you all can attest by now, my preaching.

But I have long realized that I am preaching not to the underprivileged, but to the privileged (and that I am among them). What liberation do we need? It is one thing, albeit a critically important thing, to preach to the privileged that they/we have an obligation to the underprivileged, oppressed and poor people on our doorstep and around the world, but what liberation do we need? What oppresses White, middle and upper class Americans? Some churches on the right wing of American Christianity have argued that believers are an oppressed minority (or perhaps a majority oppressing itself by its silence) in the culture wars. I find this sort of “against-ness” a somewhat weak attempt to create an identity with the oppressed people of God found in the Bible. In other words, I think it is a way to preach the obvious message of liberation found in scripture to a people who don’t realize they need liberation, so the first job is create the need by pointing to the allegedly oppressive forces of secularism.

While I reject the basis of those claims, I do think that there is an oppression from which we privileged need liberation. That oppression is self-inflicted. Call it the rat race, or keeping up with the Joneses, but it is a pressure that few of us are free from. It takes a powerful act of will and a willingness to be a bit of a social pariah to be truly liberated from these social pressures. I have longed to find a way to frame this theology and think that I may have recently stumbled on a possibility. The school of theological thought that I am proposing is based on the message of the Dr. Seuss story, The Lorax. You may need to re-read it to see what I mean, but I’ll offer a brief summation of my point.

In the story, the Once-ler has obliterated the landscape and sits in his dwelling forlorn. At the end of telling his tale he offers to the listener one single seed, the last seed of the Truffula tree. The entire future hope, including the hoped-for return of the Lorax rests on the cultivation of this single seed. He also completes the thought the Lorax began at his departure. The Lorax was lifted through the smog of the industrial disaster the Once-ler had created. All that was left behind at this ascension was a rock that read “Unless…” The Once-ler says that he now realizes that the message is “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot nothing’s going to get better. It’s not.” This strikes me as the message of liberation that we need. We can be liberated from ourselves if we can start cultivating this seed of hope and decide to care a whole awful lot.

During Lent we will be focusing specifically on the personal impact each of us can have on tending to and saving this planet that has been entrusted to our stewardship. I think that the underlying theology is the message of the Lorax. I hope you will commit yourself to an active participation in our Lenten activities and in so doing help me explore the beginning of Loraxian Theology.

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Do You Solemnly Swear or Affirm?

Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick was sworn in this week using an historical Bible that has a connection to the United Church of Christ. Here is the story as reported in the Patriot Ledger.

It was a striking and appropriate symbol of what is great about our nation. Slavery was sad mark against the grand vision of our nation. Yet it was that very idealism that led to the correction. And today we continue to progress toward claiming the high ideal of equality for all. One ironic connection to that on-going story today is the flap over the inauguration of the first Muslim member of Congress, Keith Ellison of Minnesota. He chose to have a Koran be the book on which he placed his hand in the symbolic pictures following his official swearing in. To his credit, he chose to borrow a significant Koran for this use. The book he used once belonged to Thomas Jefferson. What a splendid way to remind all of us of the way our government was designed to include people of all faiths and creeds. I think the Founding Fathers would be smiling.

To add to the irony of this alleged controversy, it is noteworthy that Rep. Ellison was not the first member of Congress to forgo a Bible at his swearing in. Debbie Wasserman Schultz took her oath in 2005 on a Tanakh, a Hebrew Bible. Not only that, but a number of presidents have deviated from this tradition as well. Theodore Roosevelt did not use a Bible in taking his first oath in 1901 (although he did use one in 1905). Herbert Hoover, citing his Quaker beliefs, chose to affirm, not swear his oath. Franklin Pierce also chose to affirm. And to top off the irony, John Quincy Adams in 1825 chose not the Bible, but a legal volume in taking his own oath of office.

Maybe we can all look beyond the petty issues that divide, to instead celebrate the grand vision that unites all of us.

Saturday, January 06, 2007

The Year in Religion

Sadly, there is clearly an unhealthy fascination with sex and violence in our culture. I was reminded of this all too obvious point as I recalled the most prominent religious news of 2006. Some of the stories were noteworthy for the controversy they raised. Our cultural obsession with partisan bickering was seen in the debate over the Da Vinci Code. There was no great challenge to religious orthodoxy in the fictional musings of Dan Brown, but there was no shortage of outraged Christians willing to make a spectacle decrying the suggestion that Jesus may have been a father. Remember the flap over the Gospel of Judas? I didn’t think so. Even in the theological academy there has been sustained buzz. The reason is that it was not really something new. There have been a number of narratives about Jesus that were not seen as gospel by the Church. It is an issue long settled with a history known to theological students. Difference of opinion is something that has yet to end Christianity, although it has created plenty of schisms over the years.

One piece of news this year was about yet another schism. This time it was a portion of the American Episcopal Church breaking from their communion to seek the leadership of a conservative Nigerian bishop because of their refusal to accept the ordination of homosexuals. In what seemed to be a related bit of Episcopal news, the American church elected its first female national bishop, Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori. Sadly, progressive moves to include diversity in sex and sexuality carry with them the threat of rupture.

Of course, one of the most shocking religious stories of the year was the fall of Rev. Ted Haggard. Again the issue of sexual preference caused a painful experience in the church. As leader of the National Association of Evangelicals, there was no way Rev. Haggard could have come out as a gay man and remained in the position. But the painful division went even deeper as he revealed his inner struggle to fight against his desires.

Two of the major religious stories focused on violence. One was the pope’s maneuvering in relation to Islam in explaining how he wasn’t really saying that it was a religion of violence after reading a quote stating just that. Regardless of his intent, he damaged interfaith dialogue in these already perilous times. As a remarkable counterpoint, we saw an Amish community in Pennsylvania offer forgiveness to the very sick man who tragically killed innocent children. In response to the popular question “what would Jesus do?” I hope we would agree that he would definitely have done what the Amish did and likely not what the pope did.

Finally, one of the stories that got little attention but ironically caused me both to despair and hope is the rejection of the Christian Coalition of their newly elected president, Rev. Joel Hunter. Rev. Hunter wanted the Christian Coalition to expand its focus to address the issues of poverty and stewardship of the environment. It is sad that the fear of being labeled a liberal (Hunter’s assessment) caused some Evangelicals to reject this move. On the other hand, there are signs that a number of Christians on the right such as Hunter and Jim Wallis of Sojourners are pushing for a more progressive social agenda in the name of Christianity. 2007 could prove to be a very interesting year for Christians in society if we can agree to this broader vision of Christian ethics.